
Solve for Disappointment
CommentsStandard 47 Eng.C-Usr.—
Near Strategic Betrayal's 42-level disruption: missing spells is costly, but taking a permanent plus a one-shot surveil can justify selective sideboard testing.
Could be wrong if Other Empower Jace cards or a permanent-heavy Standard could make the token's accumulated loyalty materially more valuable.
Pioneer 36 Eng.DUsr.—
It is much narrower and slower than Duress or Thoughtseize; the initial Jace generally amounts only to surveil 1, leaving a niche permanent-matchup role.
Could be wrong if A metagame centered on key artifacts, creatures, or enchantments could make permanent-only discard a better sideboard tool.
Modern 26 Eng.FUsr.—
Modern's Thoughtseize is cheaper and hits everything; a sorcery-speed two-mana spell that misses nonpermanents has little room, and Jace is minor upside.
Could be wrong if A highly concentrated permanent-based combo deck could create a narrow but real sideboard demand.
Legacy 23 Eng.FUsr.—
Thoughtseize and Cabal Therapy set a far more efficient disruption bar. This misses key spells and its disposable surveil token does not repay the extra mana.
Could be wrong if An unusually important permanent-centric matchup could support isolated sideboard experimentation.
Pauper 41 Eng.D+Usr.—
Unlike Duress, it can take creatures and artifacts, but two mana and sorcery speed make it weak against developed boards; the surveil supports a narrow sideboard role.
Could be wrong if If artifact and creature-combo decks become more prevalent, its broader permanent coverage could outperform this estimate.
Commander 22 Eng.FUsr.—
One opponent's permanent is a poor multiplayer exchange, and a single surveil rarely matters. It is far below broadly useful cards such as Commander’s Sphere.
Could be wrong if Dedicated Jace-token or repeat-Empower support could make banking loyalty for cards a meaningful engine.
Limited 56 Eng.C+Usr.—
Taking the best permanent before it is cast while surveilling 1 is normally worth a card in Limited, though it is weak late and misses spells; above Goblin Plate Mail's 55.
Could be wrong if Unknown set speed, removal density, and Empower support determine whether proactive discard is consistently worth a main-deck slot.
“A narrow two-mana discard spell whose disposable Jace token adds selection, but not enough immediate value for most eternal formats.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0