Prophesied End

Two mana to kill any attacker is a credible anti-aggro tool, but giving a card for precombat removal sharply limits maindeck use.

Could be wrong if White removal quality and post-release creature attack patterns are not fully supplied.

It can answer large attackers efficiently, but the attack restriction is a major liability beside Pioneer’s higher-scoring removal benchmarks.

Could be wrong if A markedly combat-heavy Pioneer metagame could make the restriction less costly.

Modern demands broader or cheaper interaction; a two-mana removal spell limited to attackers is unlikely to earn many slots.

Could be wrong if A white control shell could value its clean answer to attacking creatures more than expected.

It is far too constrained against Legacy’s efficient threats and premium one-mana interaction; Swords to Plowshares is the relevant standard.

Could be wrong if A niche combat-focused matchup could support a very narrow sideboard experiment.

Cheap removal for an attacking creature can protect a player or ally, but narrow timing and abundant broader answers keep it niche.

Could be wrong if Multiplayer politics and a combat-heavy local field may make the defensive mode more desirable.

Efficiently destroying any attacker is strong combat control, while the nonattacking mode can still answer a bomb at real card-economy cost.

Could be wrong if Unknown set speed, combat tricks, and removal density determine how reliably opponents expose key creatures.