No Admittance

Two-mana sorcery-speed 3 damage plus immediate surveil is serviceable in Izzet Spellementals, but its rate trails one-mana burn.

Could be wrong if Additional Empower Jace payoffs or unusually important three-toughness targets could make the token package substantially better.

The damage-and-selection package is testable in Izzet Aggro, but two mana at sorcery speed is a meaningful downgrade from efficient burn.

Could be wrong if A critical mass of competitive Empower Jace cards could turn its otherwise minor token into a real engine.

Izzet Prowess has cheaper spells; a two-mana sorcery for 3 damage with only surveil 1 is unlikely to retain a tight deck slot.

Could be wrong if A new, efficient Jace-token payoff could make the spell's selection and token materially more valuable.

Legacy demands much more from two mana than sorcery-speed 3 damage; the one-counter Jace normally amounts only to surveil 1.

Could be wrong if An unrevealed Legacy-viable Empower or Jace-token combo could provide a currently unsupported niche.

Madness Burn may test it as redundancy, but Lightning Bolt (91) shows how severely the extra mana and sorcery timing reduce its efficiency.

Could be wrong if If Jace tokens receive strong common payoffs, the attached surveil and token could outweigh its inefficient burn rate.

It is removal plus minor selection in Jace decks, but three sorcery-speed damage has little multiplayer impact and needs repeated Empower cards to draw.

Could be wrong if Dedicated Jace-token or planeswalker-counter strategies may value the repeatable token infrastructure more than expected.

Cheap 3-damage removal with an immediate surveil activation efficiently answers early creatures and has reach; sorcery speed keeps it below elite removal.

Could be wrong if Creature toughness, format speed, and the density of better removal remain unknown, which could shift its pick order notably.