Memory Trap

Broadly answers any nonland permanent, giving white control a plausible flexible removal slot, but three mana and enchantment vulnerability limit it versus cheaper answers.

Could be wrong if Standard's post-release threat mix may make universal permanent removal more important than its rate suggests.

Azorius control can test it as broad permanent interaction, but Pioneer rewards cheaper removal and Temporary Lockdown offers a stronger three-mana battlefield swing.

Could be wrong if It could earn sideboard use if artifacts or enchantments become unusually central targets.

A sorcery-speed three-mana one-for-one that can be undone by enchantment removal is below Modern's normal interaction rate, despite broad targeting.

Could be wrong if A newly successful white blink or prison shell could value its permanent type and broad targets.

Legacy's efficiency and cheap interaction make a three-mana vulnerable sorcery removal spell an unlikely competitive choice.

Could be wrong if A prison strategy needing an enchantment-based answer to a specific nonland permanent could create a narrow home.

It is slower than the supplied Journey to Nowhere comparable, but its ability to exile artifacts and enchantments as well gives control a credible flexible option.

Could be wrong if Creature-heavy metagames may favor cheaper creature-only removal, leaving its broader text mostly irrelevant.

Broad permanent exile is a solid white removal option for enchantment and blink-oriented decks, but sorcery speed and vulnerability make it replaceable.

Could be wrong if Players may prefer instant-speed or more resilient removal, reducing adoption outside dedicated enchantment shells.

Three mana to exile any opposing nonland permanent is premium common interaction; the delayed return on enchantment removal is a meaningful but usually acceptable drawback.

Could be wrong if Unknown set speed and enchantment-removal density could substantially change how reliable the exile effect is.