Ghalta the Immovable

Below Sunderflock (52): this is efficient only after a high-toughness setup, and no supplied Standard archetype clearly wants its defender payoff.

Could be wrong if Missing creature text and unrevealed support could supply enough naturally high-toughness bodies for a real GW shell.

More conditional than Cityscape Leveler (45); a discounted 7/7 is plausible, but the toughness-and-defender package lacks a supplied competitive home.

Could be wrong if Cheap defenders or toughness-based engines in the wider pool could make its cost reduction and attack clause substantially better.

Slightly above Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant (35): it can cost far less, but needs a narrow board state and offers no immediate card advantage or evasion.

Could be wrong if A proven shell with very cheap high-toughness creatures could turn this into a low-cost attack engine rather than a fringe finisher.

Unlike Ashen Rider (45), it has no immediate disruption when cheated out; fast interaction and Karakas make a conditional combat engine a poor fit.

Could be wrong if Legacy-accessible cheap high-toughness permanents could make the reduction unusually reliable and create a niche combo shell.

A strong backup payoff in high-toughness boards: it can be cheap, attack as a 7/7 itself, and lets defenders deal meaningful combat damage.

Could be wrong if It may be too redundant with existing toughness payoffs and too vulnerable to sweepers for optimized lists to retain.

Even with an ordinary 3-4 toughness creature, this is often a 5-6 mana 7/7 that attacks for 7; defenders become major upside.

Could be wrong if Set speed, removal, and the density of cheap high-toughness creatures are unknown; without them it can remain an awkward nine-drop.