Budding Insurgent

A 3/3 vigilance creature is serviceable, but sorcery-speed self-sacrifice makes this artifact/enchantment answer slow and narrow for competitive maindecks.

Could be wrong if Could improve if legendary enchantments or key artifact targets become prevalent after the remaining set is revealed.

Three mana and sacrificing the creature for delayed, sorcery-speed removal is inefficient beside Pioneer’s established cheap permanent interaction.

Could be wrong if Creature-toolbox shells or a major artifact/enchantment metagame could make a tutorable answer more useful.

It is a potentially searchable answer, but a three-mana 3/3 that must be sacrificed at sorcery speed is far below Modern’s normal interaction rate.

Could be wrong if A toolbox list may value the creature type and broad target range more than ordinary green decks do.

Legacy demands substantially cheaper or more immediate interaction; this creature is too slow as both a threat and an artifact/enchantment answer.

Could be wrong if An unusually important permanent-based matchup could create a very narrow sideboard use.

Common legality matters, and the 3/3 vigilance body gives this more utility than a blank Naturalize, but three mana and self-sacrifice remain costly.

Could be wrong if Its standing depends heavily on whether artifacts and enchantments remain common enough targets in Pauper.

Repeatable creature recursion can turn its sacrifice into useful broad removal, while the legendary-enchantment clause offers occasional card replacement.

Could be wrong if It is highly replaceable by cheaper permanent removal unless recursion synergy is central to the deck.

A three-mana 3/3 with vigilance is a strong baseline, and it can cash itself in for an opposing artifact or enchantment when that is more valuable.

Could be wrong if Unknown set speed and artifact/enchantment density determine how often the removal mode is relevant.