Bestial Incursion

A four-mana 4/4 token has little immediate impact, and six-mana flashback is too slow without a proven graveyard or token payoff.

Could be wrong if Additional FRA graveyard or token support could make the second body materially more valuable.

Pioneer’s established threats and engines outclass a sorcery-speed 4/4; flashback offers grindy value but not enough tempo or selection.

Could be wrong if A competitive green graveyard shell could value a self-contained flashback card more than expected.

Four mana for a vanilla token is far behind Modern’s required impact level, while paying six later is not credible competitive recursion.

Could be wrong if An unprovided token-casting or graveyard engine would need to reduce its unusually high rate cost.

Legacy has no reason to spend four mana at sorcery speed on a single 4/4, and the flashback mode is far too mana-intensive.

Could be wrong if Only a new, unusually efficient payoff for repeated creature-token spells could create a niche.

Two 4/4 tramplers from one card offers real attrition value, but four and then six mana is slow against Pauper’s efficient threats and interaction.

Could be wrong if A slower green midrange or graveyard deck could make the flashback body worth testing.

Even token decks have far more efficient multiplayer token makers; this supplies only two ordinary bodies across two expensive casts.

Could be wrong if A commander specifically rewarding creature-token creation or casting from graveyards could provide a narrow home.

A 4/4 trampler for four is a strong board presence, and flashback turns one card into a second substantial late-game threat.

Could be wrong if Unknown set speed, removal quality, and archetypes could make six-mana flashback either decisive or irrelevant.