
Humpback Whales
CommentsStandard 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Pioneer 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Modern 22 Eng.FUsr.—
Basic landcycling {2} is markedly less efficient than Generous Ent, while a six-mana 5/6 has too little immediate impact for Modern.
Could be wrong if A graveyard landcycling shell could want a blue land-finder and test it as redundant creature density.
Legacy 16 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy mana and threats vastly outpace this six-drop; costly basic landcycling is poor beside the format's superior selection.
Could be wrong if A niche graveyard deck could value the discard outlet and a resilient large creature more than expected.
Pauper 28 Eng.FUsr.—
It is much weaker at landcycling than Generous Ent, and a six-mana ground creature is unlikely to justify a slot despite ward.
Could be wrong if A slower blue deck may find its land smoothing and 5/6 ward body sufficient as a one- or two-copy top end.
Commander 21 Eng.FUsr.—
A 5/6 vigilance body with ward is modest at six mana, and one-shot basic-land fixing is too weak versus stronger blue finishers.
Could be wrong if Future Whale-specific payoffs or a very creature-type-focused list could make its typing materially relevant.
Limited 62 Eng.B-Usr.—
A 5/6 vigilance creature with ward {2} stabilizes boards well, while landcycling makes an expensive card less punishing to draw early.
Could be wrong if Set speed, removal density, and blue's archetype are unknown; a fast format could make six mana too slow.
“A bulky, protected common whose costly basic-landcycling gives it a Limited floor but little constructed efficiency.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0