
Hoshi Sato, Exolinguist
CommentsStandard 31 Eng.D-Usr.—
It always selects from at least two cards, but a five-mana 3/3 is much weaker than Quantum Riddler; no supplied type-dense shell supports more than testing.
Could be wrong if Revealed or emerging Standard creature-type synergies could make its selection substantially deeper and more reliable.
Pioneer 22 Eng.FUsr.—
The top-two minimum is functional, but five mana for a 3/3 and one selected card is far behind Pioneer’s efficient threats and engines.
Could be wrong if A credible Pioneer creature-type or blink shell could give it a narrow role.
Modern 17 Eng.FUsr.—
Modern’s speed makes a five-mana cantripping 3/3 unattractive; unlike Solitude or Sowing Mycospawn, it has no immediate disruptive or mana impact.
Could be wrong if An unusually dense creature-type engine or reliable cost-cheating shell could change its rate.
Legacy 15 Eng.FUsr.—
Even selective card replacement is not enough at five mana in Legacy without cheating it out or exploiting the ETB repeatedly.
Could be wrong if A resilient cheat-into-play or repeat-ETB application could create a small niche.
Commander 42 Eng.D+Usr.—
Creature-heavy decks can turn it into a selective cantrip body, but five mana for only one card is modest beside stronger multiplayer engines.
Could be wrong if Changeling or highly type-diverse commanders may make its selection depth and adoption better than expected.
Limited 63 Eng.B-Usr.—
Hoshi itself supplies two types, so it reliably selects from two cards while leaving a 3/3 behind; that is solid value despite weak five-mana stats.
Could be wrong if Unknown format speed, removal, and creature sizing could make a 3/3 for five either too slow or a reliable stabilizer.
“A five-mana 3/3 that always selects from at least two cards is reasonable in Limited but lacks a proven efficient constructed shell.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0