Dr. Beverly Crusher

Crusher can become large quickly and double gain-based payoffs, but a 3-mana 2/2 without a life-gain engine is a weak draw.

Could be wrong if Unrevealed Standard lifegain payoffs or reliable enablers could make its trigger-doubling much more valuable.

It has a plausible synergy role, but Pioneer asks more of a three-drop than a conditional 2/2 that needs other cards in play.

Could be wrong if A proven lifegain shell may value doubling counter and drain triggers more than this rate suggests.

Repeated lifegain can grow Crusher by two counters at a time, but it is slow, fragile, and does not supply its own life-gain engine.

Could be wrong if A dense low-cost lifegain creature shell could make the self-growing body and doubled payoffs efficient enough.

A conditional three-mana creature without immediate disruption or card advantage is unlikely to meet Legacy's efficiency threshold.

Could be wrong if An established engine exploiting doubled gain-triggered payoffs could create a narrow home.

It doubles permanents' gain-triggered payoffs and grows rapidly from repeated life gain, but does not double the life-gain triggers themselves.

Could be wrong if Its lack of protection, evasion, and independent lifegain may leave it too replaceable in optimized lists.

A 3-mana 2/2 is weak alone, but each lifegain event adds two counters; the revealed lifelink cards make that upside plausible.

Could be wrong if Draft support, lifegain density, removal, and format speed are largely unknown.