Dust to Dust
CommentsLegacy 51 Eng.CUsr.—
A sorcery-speed WW answer is narrow, but exiling two artifacts for three mana offers real sideboard equity against artifact-heavy opponents.
Could be wrong if Artifact decks may be too scarce, or cheaper and more flexible answers may keep it out of sideboards.
Pauper 75 Eng.A-Usr.—
It matches the supplied Dust to Dust comparable at 75: a clean two-for-one exile effect against Pauper artifacts.
Could be wrong if Its adoption remains tied to artifact prevalence and whether white decks can consistently support WW.
Commander 52 Eng.CUsr.—
Exiling two artifacts is efficient card advantage in multiplayer, though sorcery speed and WW make it a targeted rather than universal removal slot.
Could be wrong if Optimized lists may favor broader instant-speed interaction, reducing demand outside artifact-heavy tables.
Limited 38 Eng.DUsr.—
Three mana to answer two artifacts can swing artifact matchups, but it is often dead or only trades one-for-one in an unknown environment.
Could be wrong if The revealed artifact density may prove high enough for it to become a reliable main-deck two-for-one.
“A narrow but highly efficient artifact hoser, strongest where artifact decks are prevalent and double white is easy.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0