
Chira, All In
CommentsModern 18 Eng.FUsr.—
Chira is slower and more setup-dependent than Modern's usual engines; it neither affects the board immediately nor pays back without another card.
Could be wrong if A resilient, low-cost random-event combo shell could turn each trigger into enough mana to justify the rate.
Legacy 19 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy's mana efficiency makes a four-mana creature with no immediate value a poor default, despite the potential for niche combo experimentation.
Could be wrong if Legacy's deep pool may offer a repeatable random action that creates a compact Treasure-based combo.
Commander 47 Eng.C-Usr.—
Randomness-focused decks can repeatedly grow Chira and accrue Treasures, but four mana, tapped output, and removal exposure limit it to a matching niche.
Could be wrong if The number and quality of repeatable random effects available to a given color identity may make it stronger or more replaceable.
Limited 33 Eng.D-Usr.—
Its 3/3 body is below rate for four mana, while its payoff is strong only if the unknown environment supplies frequent random actions.
Could be wrong if The unrevealed draft archetypes could make random effects common enough for Chira to become a meaningful build-around.
“Chira is a fragile four-mana payoff whose competitive value depends almost entirely on sufficient cheap random-effect enablers.”
Rated on limited context — few cards from this set are revealed yet.
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0