
Lotho, Corrupt Shirriff
CommentsModern 34 Eng.D-Usr.—
A 2/1 with no immediate return is easy to answer; it may be tested in WB value shells, but second-spell Treasures are unreliable in 1v1.
Could be wrong if A cheap, resilient shell that routinely double-spells could make the mana engine materially better.
Legacy 31 Eng.D-Usr.—
Legacy's cheap spells can trigger Lotho, but a WB 2/1 that must survive is a slow engine against highly efficient interaction.
Could be wrong if A white-black shell able to exploit repeated Treasure while protecting Lotho could establish a niche.
Commander 68 Eng.BUsr.—
Multiple opponents naturally casting second spells can yield several Treasures per rotation, making this a strong low-cost engine despite life loss and removal risk.
Could be wrong if Optimized tables may deliberately limit second spells or remove Lotho before it produces enough mana.
Limited 53 Eng.CUsr.—
The 2/1 body is mediocre, but sequencing a second spell can bank useful fixing or mana; it is not reliable enough to be a premium pick.
Could be wrong if Unknown set speed, cheap-spell density, and removal determine whether it survives to generate meaningful Treasures.
“Lotho is a fragile one-on-one Treasure engine but a potent multiplayer payoff when several players naturally cast second spells.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0