Bilbo, Unexpected Adventurer
CommentsLegacy 17 Eng.FUsr.—
Four mana for a 2/2 that must survive and connect is far below Legacy's normal rate, and its small-permanent recursion is too delayed.
Could be wrong if A novel cheap permanent engine with exceptional payoff could justify a fringe attempt.
Commander 46 Eng.C-Usr.—
Repeatable recursion of creatures, artifacts, and enchantments costing three or less is useful in prepared graveyard decks, but Bilbo needs evasion and setup.
Could be wrong if Token-heavy tables and routine creature removal may prevent enough combat triggers to justify the slot.
Limited 67 Eng.BUsr.—
Once it connects, returning a cheap permanent is substantial repeatable value; its weak four-mana body and dependence on a stocked graveyard cap it below bomb status.
Could be wrong if Unknown speed, removal, token density, and graveyard support could make its attacks far less reliable.
“Bilbo offers repeatable low-cost permanent recursion, but a four-mana 2/2 needs setup and successful attacks before generating value.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0