Banishing Light

It answers any nonland permanent, but Modern's efficient interaction makes a fragile sorcery-speed three-mana answer a narrow fallback.

Could be wrong if An unusually important permanent that dodges cheaper removal could justify sideboard adoption.

Legacy demands much cheaper or more resilient answers; this remains functional broad removal but is inefficient and easily undone.

Could be wrong if A specific problematic nonland permanent with few other answers could create a niche sideboard use.

Unlike Journey to Nowhere, it answers artifacts and enchantments as well as creatures, but costing an extra mana is a substantial Pauper penalty.

Could be wrong if If artifact-centric decks remain prominent, its broad targeting may earn more maindeck slots than expected.

Broad exile is useful and its ETB can be reused, but three mana and vulnerability leave it behind premium permanent answers such as Beast Within.

Could be wrong if Higher enchantment-matter or blink density could make its recursion and typing more valuable.

Three-mana removal for any nonland permanent is premium Limited interaction, though opponents can remove the enchantment and recover the card.

Could be wrong if Unknown removal density and set speed determine whether the aura-like vulnerability meaningfully lowers its pick order.