Uneasy Partings

Not legal in this format after release.

Not legal in this format after release.

Three mana against an attacker is still far behind Modern removal; unlike Dismember, it has no cheap proactive use.

Could be wrong if A creature-heavy metagame where library placement is uniquely valuable could create a narrow sideboard role.

Even discounted, this is a three-mana reactive answer in a format where Force of Will and cheaper removal set the bar.

Could be wrong if It could see isolated sideboard testing if library removal matters against a specific creature strategy.

A three-mana instant answer to an attacking nontoken creature is plausible control-sideboard material, but token misses and four-mana floor constrain it.

Could be wrong if Its clean answer to death triggers and large creatures may prove more valuable than the mana rate suggests.

Permanent library removal has utility, but four mana and commander-zone replacement make it a narrow alternative to broader interaction.

Could be wrong if Creature-centric tables may make the attacking discount reliable enough for wider inclusion.

Instant-speed removal for a nontoken creature is solid, often costing three once combat starts, though it cannot answer tokens.

Could be wrong if Unknown speed, token prevalence, and available removal could move this between replacement-level and premium.