Radagast of Rhosgobel

Green creature decks can deploy this ahead of curve; if it survives, one discounted flash creature on each turn cycle generates substantial tempo.

Could be wrong if Aggro decks may lack the time, creature density, or worthwhile curve-toppers to justify a four-mana setup card.

The discount-and-flash engine is powerful after untapping, but a four-mana 2/5 with no immediate value is a demanding rate in Pioneer.

Could be wrong if A dense creature shell that can protect it and exploit both turns could make it a recurring role-player.

Its unusual static ability merits testing in creature-heavy combo shells, but investing four mana in a 2/5 before value is a major Modern liability.

Could be wrong if An existing shell with enough cheap creatures and protection could convert its flash clause into a stronger tempo engine.

Acceleration may permit experiments, but {G}{G}, no immediate payoff, and efficient interaction leave this four-mana engine poorly positioned.

Could be wrong if A green accelerated creature shell could exploit repeated discounts more effectively than expected.

Creature-heavy decks can use a two-mana reduction on each player's turn, while granting flash turns held creatures into meaningful interaction.

Could be wrong if It is fragile, costs four mana, and is much weaker in decks unable to consistently cast creatures on opponents' turns.

A 2/5 stabilizes the board, then repeated discounts and surprise blockers create major tempo; it is a strong first pick, not a self-contained bomb.

Could be wrong if Unknown removal density, format speed, and creature curves could make its delayed payoff substantially less reliable.