Misty Mountains Raider

A 5-mana 4/4 that needs a later attack to create value is too slow for listed decks; Goblin/amass density may justify testing, but no shell is established.

Could be wrong if Remaining revealed or unrevealed amass and Goblin payoffs could make a dedicated Standard token shell viable.

Pioneer demands more immediate impact than a five-mana 4/4 with delayed combat value; it is far below recurring five-mana role-players.

Could be wrong if A resilient Goblin tribal shell could value the repeatable Army growth more than current context suggests.

Five mana for no immediate board swing is badly off Modern's rate, and the attack trigger is vulnerable to removal and blocking before it pays off.

Could be wrong if An unusually dense Goblin synergy package could make this a fringe top-end, though none is supplied.

Legacy's efficiency and interaction make a five-mana combat-only value creature implausible; it offers neither haste, disruption, nor immediate card advantage.

Could be wrong if A specialized Goblin deck could test it as a grindy payoff, but the mana cost remains a major obstacle.

Goblin or Army decks can use repeatable combat growth, but five mana for a 4/4 with no ETB effect is a weak, replaceable multiplayer payoff.

Could be wrong if Broader Commander support for Army tokens or attack triggers could make the repeated amass materially more valuable.

A 4/4 is a serviceable five-drop, and every attack creates or grows a lasting Army by two even if blocked; it should snowball board presence.

Could be wrong if Unknown set speed, removal, and creature sizing could make a five-drop attacker substantially less reliable.