
Gnashing of Teeth
CommentsStandard 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Pioneer 0 Eng.FUsr.—
Not legal in this format after release.
Modern 39 Eng.DUsr.—
The flexible modes invite testing, but it is slower and weaker as a sweeper than Whipflare (47); -5/-5 sorcery removal is inefficient here.
Could be wrong if A metagame dense with one-toughness creatures or death-recursion targets could make its modality valuable.
Legacy 26 Eng.FUsr.—
Legacy's efficient removal makes 1BB sorcery speed a major liability; it is far below Toxic Deluge (68) or Massacre (67) as a sweeper.
Could be wrong if A sustained x/1-heavy field could create a narrow sideboard role despite the poor rate.
Commander 21 Eng.FUsr.—
A three-mana sorcery that usually removes one creature is highly replaceable; the -1/-1 mode only answers narrow token or x/1 boards.
Could be wrong if Token-heavy local environments may make the one-sided sweep mode a worthwhile niche inclusion.
Limited 68 Eng.BUsr.—
-5/-5 for three mana should kill most creatures, while the alternate one-sided -1/-1 can punish tokens and x/1s; BB constrains splashing.
Could be wrong if Unknown creature toughness, token prevalence, and format speed could make either mode notably better or worse.
“A serviceable but inefficient removal spell in eternal formats, with much stronger prospects as premium Limited interaction.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Previewed 22 July by EDH War Room
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0