
Garruk, Veiled Butcher
CommentsStandard 58 Eng.C+Usr.—
At five mana it trails Chandra, Spark Hunter (60); -3 is potent when stabilized, but -2 needs fodder and +2 mainly answers 1-toughness creatures.
Could be wrong if A black midrange shell or creature-recursion metagame could make its static ability and edict substantially more valuable.
Pioneer 46 Eng.C-Usr.—
The Rock can exploit the sacrifice mode, but five mana is slow and its narrow +2 leaves it below Chandra, Torch of Defiance (66).
Could be wrong if If creature recursion and sacrifice decks become prominent, the static exile clause could justify recurring copies.
Modern 28 Eng.FUsr.—
Around Elspeth, Storm Slayer (27): strong text, but five mana, BB, and weak immediate creature control offer no clear role in fast Modern decks.
Could be wrong if A slower black shell with reliable acceleration and disposable creatures could turn -2 into a credible payoff.
Legacy 27 Eng.FUsr.—
Much slower and less resilient than Kaito, Bane of Nightmares (58); even with Ancient Tomb, BB and a weak +2 make it a niche grindy payoff.
Could be wrong if Ancient Tomb-based black prison strategies could exploit the early discard and asymmetric death replacement better than expected.
Commander 47 Eng.C-Usr.—
Sacrifice decks can turn -2 into an edict plus Beast, while the static clause disrupts opposing death loops; five mana limits broad adoption.
Could be wrong if The multiplayer -3 may prove much stronger in discard/stax shells, or too politically costly to activate reliably.
Limited 80 Eng.A-Usr.—
A high-loyalty walker with a repeatable shrink effect, edict-plus-4/4 potential, and two-card discard is a strong first pick, especially with fodder.
Could be wrong if Unknown removal, speed, and token availability could make the -2 less reliable and expose its weak +2.
“Garruk offers discard, edicts, and asymmetric death-exile utility, but five mana and limited immediate removal constrain competitive use.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0