
Enlightened Confidant
CommentsStandard 42 Eng.D+Usr.—
Selesnya Aggro can test it as a two-drop; an unanswered lifelink hit can turn surveil into a cheap card, but its 2/1 body and delayed trigger are fragile.
Could be wrong if It improves if reliable life-gain triggers or protection emerge; it falls if one-toughness attackers rarely connect.
Pioneer 29 Eng.FUsr.—
No supplied Pioneer shell clearly wants a delayed 2/1 engine. Self-lifelink can produce filtered cards after combat, but removal and board pressure make its floor poor.
Could be wrong if A low-curve white lifegain shell could make repeated end-step selection substantially more reliable.
Modern 24 Eng.FUsr.—
Boros Aggro is the plausible test bed, but a two-mana 2/1 with no immediate effect must survive combat and an end step before producing value.
Could be wrong if It could rise if its low-mana-value recursion proves uniquely exploitable; no such support is supplied.
Legacy 20 Eng.FUsr.—
Boros Aggro could test it, but requiring both survival to the end step and a combat connection makes its card advantage too slow and exposed.
Could be wrong if A dense lifegain shell or unusually favorable creature matchup could make the repeated selection matter more.
Commander 49 Eng.C-Usr.—
Lifegain decks can trigger it consistently and turn surveil into recurring low-cost cards; its fragile body and once-per-turn ceiling keep it specialized.
Could be wrong if It rises with dense repeatable lifegain engines, but optimized lists may prefer immediate and more resilient draw.
Limited 61 Eng.B-Usr.—
A two-mana lifelinker normally makes white decks, and an unblocked attack can filter then recover a cheap card; one toughness keeps it answerable.
Could be wrong if Draft speed, removal density, and lifegain support are unknown, so its ability to attack repeatedly is uncertain.
“A fragile two-drop that can turn repeated life gain into filtered card advantage, but needs to survive and connect.”
AI prediction made before release — not a measured result. Real performance data replaces this once the set is legal and tournament results come in.
Your rating, on the same 0–100 scale the engine uses.
5 ratings are needed on a format before its community average is shown publicly beside the engine's.
Comments 0